Today's passage: Leviticus 18
So far in Leviticus, we have read about some laws that seem a bit alien to a contemporary Christian. Examples of these include laws regarding foods and their preparation. In Leviticus 18, we read something that seems odd for the opposite reason. As I read the various unlawful sexual relations described therein, I wondered why many of them had to be decreed at all. Most of them just seemed to be fundamental tenets of morality. Most seemed to be as universal as the laws of gravity.
Quite by coincidence, today I read in the USAToday about an isolated Peruvian tribe of Indians (the Mashco-Piro) who have recently been blamed for killing their one contact to the rest of the world, Shaco Flores. Shaco spoke similar dialects, so he was able to converse with the Mashco-Piro. It may have been a rogue "bad" Indian that killed Shaco, or it may have been something demanded of their social code for some offense Shaco had committed. Given they are an isolated culture and they killed their only contact with the outside world, all I or anyone else can do is guess why. The Mashco-Piro seem to have views well outside the norm on certain actions. For example, kidnapping women and children from other tribes is reportedly acceptable. As I was thinking about this blog, the two readings (Leviticus and the Peruvian article) kind of merged to form some basic questions: of the 15 "uncontacted" tribes in Peru, how many of them have the same basic tenets of morality? How much of what we consider basic morality would they share?
As I looked at Leviticus 18, most of the laws I was reading on sexual morality seemed almost universal. To me, it seemed that the reason the laws I was reading were fundamental tenets of morality was that these same laws of Leviticus 18 were widely adopted by Western civilization. I was going to research and write on this, but what I initially found indicated that I had stumbled upon a hornet's nest that I don't particularly want to kick. A quick google search on the subject matter will reveal that there are many who will argue against my assumption (as well as many who argue for it). It seems some of the passion involved in these arguments stems from some of the subjects contained within that are controversial in modern times. To be honest, I do not know enough about the subject to say whether my hunch is supported or rejected by fact. But I can say this, the vast majority of laws laid out in Leviticus 18 are commonly accepted in most Western societies and Leviticus is the oldest recorded law on such matters of which I am aware. Even if this is incorrect, I feel safe in saying that the laws of Leviticus 18 became accepted norms for the Christians to follow in years to come (I find it interesting to note that as Christians, they were free from these same laws). By this criteria alone, the laws of Leviticus 18 are in some ways fundamental to many modern societies and therefore of great historical significance.
As a side note, one thing that was not familiar was "Molek." In case you were wondering, Molek was apparently a deity worshiped by some middle eastern cultures including Canaanites and Phoenicians. Apparently children were offered in sacrifice to Molek.
As a second note, if anyone is desirous of kicking some hornet's nests with Leviticus 18 as your ammo to prove some point or another, do as you wish, but I suggest a quick stop by Romans 6:14. There you will find: "For sin shall no longer be your master, because you are not under the law, but under grace."